Google
RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 
 


Editorial Categories:

FINANCIAL SERVICES
ADVISERS & BROKERS
BANKING & BONDS
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
COLUMNISTS
CONSUMER AFFAIRS
CRIME & FRAUD
ECONOMY & GLOBAL
EDUCATION & TRAINING
ESTATES & WILLS
HEALTHCARE INSURANCE
INDUSTRY & LEGISLATION
INSURANCE
INVESTING
LEGAL AFFAIRS
LIABILITY INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MARKETING
PEOPLE & COMPANIES
POLITICS
PROPERTY
RETIREMENT PROVISION
REVIEWS
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
SHARES & UNIT TRUSTS
SHORT-TERM INSURANCE
TAXATION
TECHNOLOGY
VIEWS & LETTERS


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events



Save by getting insurance quotes


Proudly South AfricanInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Car, household, life and business insurance quotes

News Article : Unintended negative consequences for many
Category: Advisers & Brokers : Commission & Fees
Author:Friedman Twala
Email:[email protected]
Posted:11 Dec 2008

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

BHF statement questioned

Statement issued by the Joint Broker Forum (JBF) on issues concerning proposals by the Council for Medical Schemes to revise the regulatory framework on health broker remuneration.

The JBF was established to represent the members of the Financial Intermediaries Association of Southern Africa (FIA), the Financial Planning Institute (FPI), Black Broker Service Network (BBSN), and the South African Health Intermediary Association (SAHIA) on this matter and will be making a submission to the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) on or before the due date for submissions of 6 February 2009.
 
The JBF has fundamental concerns that there will be significant unintended consequences should the CMS proposals be adopted. 

These proposals basically provide for two categories of health broker, namely a scheme agent and an independent advisor. 

Scheme agents would need to select a particular medical scheme to market and would be paid, uncapped, by the scheme concerned. 

Independent advisors would provide advice to members and employers and would be paid an agreed fee directly by the member or employer.
 
The primary concerns that the JBF has identified with the proposals outlined by the CMS are:

The end of independent affordable advice for the majority of covered and uncovered members. 

Current legislation prohibits brokers from earning more than R60.70 (ex VAT) per family per month for advising members on which scheme to select, which option to select within that scheme, informing members on the details of their chosen option and protecting members’ rights from the incorrect application of underwriting rules and key legislation (eg. payment of treatment in terms of the prescribed minimum benefits), to name but a few services provided.

Should the CMS proposals be adopted, independent advice on these and other health related matters would, in many cases, be provided on an hour-based professional fee.

Lack of significant savings from the introduction of these proposals.

Uncapped agent fees and additional services that would have to be provided by the scheme or its administrator would consume much of what is currently paid to brokers, an average of 2.2% of contributions.

The resultant impact may even lead to an increase in contributions.

Increased member confusion. 

Hard selling scheme agents, marketing one scheme only, would need to continuously place new members with schemes they represent in order to earn ongoing income. 

The CMS has clarified that these agents would only be able to earn once-off uncapped “marketing fees” and this may result in massive churn between schemes, both in terms of members and marketing agents themselves.

Decreased competition. 

Bigger schemes with bigger marketing budgets and more prominent brands would have the most agents marketing their products.

These agents would be looking for new members from smaller, perhaps more vulnerable schemes. 

The end result may be that only a few large schemes remain, thus limiting member choice.

Independent fee earning advisors would have to consider this risk to the environment when providing their advice, possibly exacerbating the issue.   

The JBF is concerned that the Board of Healthcare Funders (BHF) and its member schemes may not have considered some of these issues in reaching their conclusion as set out in a press release issued by BHF on 10 December 2008. 

In this press release, they note that “the majority of medical schemes agreed with the Council’s proposals that there be a clear differentiation between independent advisors and marketing agents”.

Discovery Health recently resigned as a member of BHF. 
 
The JBF is further concerned about the process followed by BHF in reaching this conclusion.

However, the substance of the discussions recently held in the two BHF regional meetings, on which their conclusion is based, has not been made clear and there are concerns that a conclusion was sought without proper due process or investigation into the true impact on the industry going forward.
 
The JBF will be engaging with BHF and medical schemes and will suggest that a more formal process be adopted prior to the determination of a medical scheme industry conclusion. 

The JBF suggests that BHF:

  • Canvass opinion on the CMS proposals from open schemes only – restricted medical schemes are not affected by the proposed change;
  • That the schemes submit their decisions to the BHF in writing;
  • That these scheme decisions reflect the positions of the respective Boards of those schemes; and
  • That information is published on the outcome of that process in terms of numbers of schemes (representing “x” members) with particular views one way or another. This will serve as an important barometer that will assist in accurately gauging the true BHF sentiment and the extent to which this sentiment is held.

The JBF supports ethical practices and the current situation is one where the actions of a few may have led to changes that could have unintended negative consequences for many.

Friedman Twala is the Chairman of the JBF
 

Comments:
There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.



Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps



Join us today

Insurance Quotes


Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog

Advisers & Brokers - Commission & Fees
Best Advice
Commission & Fees
Compliance
FAIS Registration
National Lobby
Networks

More in Advisers & Brokers : Commission & Fees
The FSR Bill must under go a socioeconomic impact assessment (SEIA) to protect consumers
Consumers rights and interests are scarcely mentioned
Old Mutual responds to excess fees criticism
System defaults and the epidemic of one
Joint Brokers Forum statement on CMS remuneration proposals for healthcare intermediaries
JBF opposed to any proposals that would contravene fair competition
Insurance Commission Regulation: Inappropriate and Undesirable
Global trend concerning commission is one of deregulation combined with increased disclosure
Transition arrangements for new commission dispensation
Broker comments
Letter to the Editor
Banging your head against a wall burns 150 calories an hour
It seems that the independent broker is on a hiding to nothing
We need to really have our views heard or the independent will largely disappear
Behind the IGF
A question of guarantees
Letter to the Editor - some form of reform is needed
Proactive engagement with the LOA, FSB and National Treasury is needed
Life Assurance Costs
Broker wrangle
Smoke screen
Ludicrous proposals, says IBC
On the table
The industry finally agrees to review practice
Two sides
What about life company charges?
Reforms at last . . .
A bit of history


Available Recruitment:
No Vacancies Listed...


ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.