Google
RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 
 


Editorial Categories:

FINANCIAL SERVICES
ADVISERS & BROKERS
BANKING & BONDS
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
COLUMNISTS
CONSUMER AFFAIRS
CRIME & FRAUD
ECONOMY & GLOBAL
EDUCATION & TRAINING
ESTATES & WILLS
HEALTHCARE INSURANCE
INDUSTRY & LEGISLATION
INSURANCE
INVESTING
LEGAL AFFAIRS
LIABILITY INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MARKETING
PEOPLE & COMPANIES
POLITICS
PROPERTY
RETIREMENT PROVISION
REVIEWS
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
SHARES & UNIT TRUSTS
SHORT-TERM INSURANCE
TAXATION
TECHNOLOGY
VIEWS & LETTERS


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events



Save by getting insurance quotes


Proudly South AfricanInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Car, household, life and business insurance quotes

News Article : Transition arrangements for new commission dispensation
Category: Advisers & Brokers : Commission & Fees
Author:Edited by ITInews
Email:[email protected]
Posted:02 Jul 2007

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

Broker comments

They protected their own backsides and made the broker the scapegoat - Changes proposed by the LOA are calamitous - The already woeful savings rate will drop even further

Morning Brent

With regards to the restructured commission on RA’s and Endowments, my comments:

  1. The revised commission is a spill-over from all the negative publicity (and duly so) these investment models endured the past year or so.  The insurance companies had to save face (for exploiting investors) and they did this by making me (the broker) the scapegoat and especially our commission.
  2. The LOA (consisting of representatives of all the insurance companies) did not protect us, nor did they inform the public of the real problem i.e. the high admin cost factor being charged, etc.  Instead they protected their own backsides and supported the negative adjustment of our commission.

According to me the whole issue is a farce and me, the broker, has to foot the bill.  Over the years our overheads have increased dramatically (beyond our control) and I’ll only accept the new commission structure if the upfront portion is waived from any future claw back – this means we are generating an immediate income to cover overheads, etc like any normal sound business needs to remain sustainable.

Finally, this is only the beginning and commission on risk products will come under attack shortly.  What can we do about it? 

We need One body representing all brokers to take a stance against the insurance companies, LOA and other meaningless bodies and fight for what is right and just. 

Until such time nothing will change to the benefit of brokers.

GeorgeThom


I think these latest Commission changes proposed by the LOA (who clearly do not have my, the independent intermediary's interests at heart) are calamitous.
 
With these commission levels being paid on Retirement annuities and endowment polices no one can afford to sell them. Not to mention the 5 year commission re-claw, what short memories the LOA member companies have. The last time they tried that with RAs they simply didn't sell any of them.

The crux of the matter here is that the Life offices costs on these products are by far the biggest problem and cost to the client.

Anyone who has recently had an endowment mature (I have) and who has asked for a breakdown of his return will see that the intermediary commission is not even one third of your total costs.

Until the life offices reduce their costs dramatically (and I mean halve or more) no one will get value from these products. Every time there is pressure in the financial services industry to lower costs for clients, the Life offices band together and penalize the intermediary.

Who do they think is going to sell this dubious product to clients?

With 5 years re-claw of commission risk to worry about? And having to comply with all the legislation and possible fines and jail terms if something goes wrong? After having done all proper fact finding, analyses and disclosures? Not me. The CEO of the Life Company can hop in his car and go sell it himself.
 
Remember that this is being forced upon us against a historical background of dwindling income for intermediaries. Medical scheme commissions were slashed and didn't solve or constitute the costing problems for medical schemes anyway.

We were also told at that time to "adjust your business model". All investment policy commissions are now being slashed instead of treating the real source of the problem-life offices. And risk policies are next on the radar for Treasury and the LOA.
 
This is quite obviously unsustainable, but as usual it will take the decimation of the intermediary and his business, and the subsequent catastrophic reduction in income to the Life offices before the industry realizes it has bitten off the hand that feeds it.

In the interim we are literally being forced to move into another sphere of business that can provide an income we can no longer rely on or even generate from our financial practices.
 
The total and fundamental overhaul of the Life Offices and how they do business is the only way this industry can survive. We can’t be paying CEOs of these companies millions a year while the people who pay this salary by generating product sales are systematically penalized.

Mark Eardley


Hello Brent,

It seems to me that the LOA (read assurers) are only waking up now to what we (Luasa and some intermediaries) were telling them two years ago.

Some people may say that it just goes to show what little thought was given to the original LOA proposals (May 2005) as to the financial effect on intermediaries and how little they really care about them, and that they were prepared to throw them to the wolves in a desperate attempt to hang on to the status quo regarding confiscatory penalties for RAs and Endowment policies early termination penalties.

Of course now that they have woken up, it is a case of damage control. I predict that when these new and unnecessary measures come into effect, the already woeful savings rate will drop even further.

Could it be that there will be available all these wonderful lower cost plans, but fewer members of the public will actually invest in them, as the sales ( I subscribe to the old saw that assurance is sold not bought) will have dramatically dropped?

If this does happen, one has to ask how this has and will improve the position of Joe and Jane Citizen.

Gavin Hillyard

Comments:
There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.



Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps



Join us today

Insurance Quotes


Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog

Advisers & Brokers - Commission & Fees
Best Advice
Commission & Fees
Compliance
FAIS Registration
National Lobby
Networks

More in Advisers & Brokers : Commission & Fees
The FSR Bill must under go a socioeconomic impact assessment (SEIA) to protect consumers
Consumers rights and interests are scarcely mentioned
Old Mutual responds to excess fees criticism
System defaults and the epidemic of one
Joint Brokers Forum statement on CMS remuneration proposals for healthcare intermediaries
JBF opposed to any proposals that would contravene fair competition
Unintended negative consequences for many
BHF statement questioned
Insurance Commission Regulation: Inappropriate and Undesirable
Global trend concerning commission is one of deregulation combined with increased disclosure
Letter to the Editor
Banging your head against a wall burns 150 calories an hour
It seems that the independent broker is on a hiding to nothing
We need to really have our views heard or the independent will largely disappear
Behind the IGF
A question of guarantees
Letter to the Editor - some form of reform is needed
Proactive engagement with the LOA, FSB and National Treasury is needed
Life Assurance Costs
Broker wrangle
Smoke screen
Ludicrous proposals, says IBC
On the table
The industry finally agrees to review practice
Two sides
What about life company charges?
Reforms at last . . .
A bit of history

Join ITInews in supporting Helpnet.org.za

Available Recruitment:
No Vacancies Listed...


ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.