Google
RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 
 


Editorial Categories:

FINANCIAL SERVICES
ADVISERS & BROKERS
BANKING & BONDS
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
COLUMNISTS
CONSUMER AFFAIRS
CRIME & FRAUD
ECONOMY & GLOBAL
EDUCATION & TRAINING
ESTATES & WILLS
HEALTHCARE INSURANCE
INDUSTRY & LEGISLATION
INSURANCE
INVESTING
LEGAL AFFAIRS
LIABILITY INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MARKETING
PEOPLE & COMPANIES
POLITICS
PROPERTY
RETIREMENT PROVISION
REVIEWS
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
SHARES & UNIT TRUSTS
SHORT-TERM INSURANCE
TAXATION
TECHNOLOGY
VIEWS & LETTERS


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events



Save by getting insurance quotes


Proudly South AfricanInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Car, household, life and business insurance quotes

News Article : The latest on Bonitas Medical Fund
Category: Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
Author:Edited by ITInews
Email:[email protected]
Posted:03 Feb 2011

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

Postponement of the special general meeting and elections to 28 May 2011

In November 2010 the Registrar of Medical Schemes appointed independent inspectors to conduct an inspection into the affairs of Bonitas Marketing (Pty) Ltd and Bonitas Medical Fund in terms of the Inspection of Financial Institutions Act 80 of 1998.

Bonitas Marketing (Pty) Ltd

Bonitas Marketing approached the South Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg that same month to try and interdict the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) from conducting an inspection into the company.

But by the time Bonitas Marketing had launched its court application, the inspection had already been completed and the inspectors had furnished a report to the CMS. The application is pending and is expected to be heard soon.

Bonitas Marketing is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bonitas Medical Fund.

The former Managing Director of Bonitas Marketing had brought allegations of irregularities in the management of both Bonitas Marketing and the scheme to the Registrar.

Some allegations were levelled directly at Gerhard van Emmenis, the acting Principal Officer of Bonitas Medical Fund who is vested with the powers and functions of the Board of Trustees pending the election of a new Board.

Bonitas Medical Fund has a direct interest in Bonitas Marketing and the latter is therefore seen as an associated institution of the medical scheme for the purposes of the Inspections Act.

This Act empowers the Registrar to conduct inspections into the affairs of financial institutions associated with medical schemes – in this case Bonitas Marketing.

Bonitas Medical Fund

In December 2010 the CMS approached the South Gauteng High Court for an order divesting Gerhard van Emmenis of the powers and functions of the Board and instead placing them with independent persons (case number 33573/2010).

Gerhard van Emmenis is opposing this application. His application is also pending and is expected to be set down for hearing soon.

Bonitas Medical Fund was required to hold a special general meeting for its members to elect a new Board by 6 December 2010 but the CMS and the scheme had agreed to change this date to 5 February 2011.

The scheme has failed to appoint an independent electoral body to conduct the elections and did not timeously publish a second notice calling for nominations of trustees.

In terms of its rules, Bonitas Medical Fund is required to send to members a list of qualified nominees 14 days before the date of the special general meeting during which a new Board is to be elected by members.

The scheme approached the South Gauteng High Court on Tuesday and obtained a postponement of the special general meeting and elections to 28 May 2011.

In the meantime, on 31 January 2011, the trustees of Bonitas Medical Fund approached the South Gauteng Court seeking an order to be re-vested with their powers and functions (case number 4206/2011).

They also want a court order declaring that Gerhard van Emmenis and the Bonitas Medical Fund do not have to comply with the terms of the court order of 17 September 2010 which divested them of their powers and directed that Gerald van Emmenis ensure that a new Board be elected.

The trustees also want the compliance officer, Joseph Maluleke, to be removed immediately.

The CMS will soon take a decision on the fitness and propriety of some of the trustees who want their powers and functions back.

“This is another example of how committed we are to serving the best interests of beneficiaries,” said Dr Monwabisi Gantsho, the Registrar and Chief Executive of the CMS, today.

“We are prepared to do whatever it takes to ensure that beneficiaries are protected and the sustainability of medical schemes is promoted with the support and cooperation of trustees who are fit and proper to run these complex insurance vehicles.”

Comments:
There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.



Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps



Join us today

Insurance Quotes


Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog

Healthcare Insurance - Medical Schemes
Aids
Medical Schemes
Medicines
State Healthcare

More in Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
The healthy decline of South African Medical Aid Schemes
Raising contributions while reducing benefits is not sustainable
Regulation 8 – Do we really think this is our only problem?
A rights based medical scheme framework with voluntary membership requirements
Discovery Health response to Stan Eiser
It is unclear why Mr. Eiser chooses to persist with these unfounded allegations
Discovery’s probable loss of control over Discovery Health Medical Scheme
By now Gore should have reduced Limited’s cash dependency on DHMS
Medical aids "need to demystify themselves"
Medical aids are offering less value for money
Regulator of medical schemes concerned over false advertising, high administration fees
"The public is being misled"
High Court dismissal of BHF application has profound implications for medical schemes industry
Triumph of a fanciful ideology on healthcare financing that lacks sustainability
I found your article on the court ruling regarding PMBs to be misleading
The uncertainty with regards to pricing of healthcare will be allowed to continue
Victory for regulator, members of medical schemes
The prescribed minimum benefits (PMBs) which protect members of medical schemes remain in place
Regulator deregisters GetMed Medical Scheme
Complaints received from its members
There are 2 realities about private medical cover in SA
Firstly it is expensive and secondly, benefit structures are complex
Regulator wants curator for Sizwe Medical Fund
Investigation points to material irregularities
Bonitas in new hands
Costs awarded on a punitive basis
Regulator wants curator for Bonitas Medical Fund
... the third-largest medical scheme
Resolution no longer an administrator and managed care organisation
Flagrant contravention of the provisions contained in Regulation 23 of the Medical Schemes Act
How to choose your medical aid
I’m often asked by patients to
SAG Response to SAMA
Reduce the power of administrators
Specialist Advocacy Group overview
Particularly concerned for the safety of the patient in the current environment
Nonsense, says Discovery Health, we’ve never been better - response to newsletter
DHMS continues to enjoy the highest rating of any medical scheme in South Africa
Public or private practice?
Healthcare is a monopolistic business

Join ITInews in supporting Helpnet.org.za

Available Recruitment:
No Vacancies Listed...


ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.