Google
RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 
 


Editorial Categories:

FINANCIAL SERVICES
ADVISERS & BROKERS
BANKING & BONDS
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
COLUMNISTS
CONSUMER AFFAIRS
CRIME & FRAUD
ECONOMY & GLOBAL
EDUCATION & TRAINING
ESTATES & WILLS
HEALTHCARE INSURANCE
INDUSTRY & LEGISLATION
INSURANCE
INVESTING
LEGAL AFFAIRS
LIABILITY INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MARKETING
PEOPLE & COMPANIES
POLITICS
PROPERTY
RETIREMENT PROVISION
REVIEWS
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
SHARES & UNIT TRUSTS
SHORT-TERM INSURANCE
TAXATION
TECHNOLOGY
VIEWS & LETTERS


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events



Save by getting insurance quotes


Proudly South AfricanInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Car, household, life and business insurance quotes

News Article : High Court dismissal of BHF application has profound implications for medical schemes industry
Category: Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
Author:Edited by ITInews
Email:[email protected]
Posted:11 Nov 2011

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

Triumph of a fanciful ideology on healthcare financing that lacks sustainability

The High Court dismissal this week to have Prescribed Minimum Benefits (PMB) paid at medical scheme tariffs rather than actual cost could have profound implications for the medical schemes industry.

This is according to Michael Settas, director of the Healthcare Portfolio at Pollen Interactions, a specialist healthcare PR agency.

The Board of Healthcare Funders (BHF) brought an application before the Gauteng High Court seeking such relief whilst the industry regulator, the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS), opposed the application.

"The CMS has declared the dismissal a victory for consumers - but is it really?  It is a well-known fact that the typical supply and demand counter balances evident in functional free markets are not present in healthcare markets - and the dismissal of the BHF's application will make this imbalance even worse."

"Under these circumstances regulatory provisions should be seeking price control mechanisms - not offering unfettered price determination to the very same suppliers of the service," says Michael.

Current regulations under the Medical Schemes Act permit schemes to establish networks of preferred doctors (called Designated Service Providers or "DSPs") who deliver medical services to their members at a negotiated price.

"These regulations also dictate that if a scheme does not have a network of DSPs or if these DSPs are not readily available to members within a reasonable distance or time frame, then the member is free to use any other provider - and now, if this service is a PMB, medical schemes must pay these accounts at cost and not the scheme's tariff level.

"The crux for schemes without well-established networks is there now exists little incentive for doctors to enter into a DSP arrangement since the dismissal of the BHF's application offers providers a blank cheque book."

"Worse still is the incentive for current DSPs to withdraw from existing networks and rely on the regulations to charge fees for PMB services at any level," warns Michael.

"This can hardly be described as a victory for consumers but rather the triumph of a fanciful ideology on healthcare financing that lacks sustainability."

"The inflationary cost pressures of this ruling are simply going to be passed onto consumers in the form of higher medical scheme contributions.

"This ironically comes at a time when Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi is talking about managing the already unacceptable cost increases in the private sector. It is surely incongruous that all the noble intentions shown by the good Minister could be undone by a legal challenge from within his own department," concludes Michael

Comments:
There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.



Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps



Join us today

Insurance Quotes


Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog

Healthcare Insurance - Medical Schemes
Aids
Medical Schemes
Medicines
State Healthcare

More in Healthcare Insurance : Medical Schemes
The healthy decline of South African Medical Aid Schemes
Raising contributions while reducing benefits is not sustainable
Regulation 8 – Do we really think this is our only problem?
A rights based medical scheme framework with voluntary membership requirements
Discovery Health response to Stan Eiser
It is unclear why Mr. Eiser chooses to persist with these unfounded allegations
Discovery’s probable loss of control over Discovery Health Medical Scheme
By now Gore should have reduced Limited’s cash dependency on DHMS
Medical aids "need to demystify themselves"
Medical aids are offering less value for money
Regulator of medical schemes concerned over false advertising, high administration fees
"The public is being misled"
I found your article on the court ruling regarding PMBs to be misleading
The uncertainty with regards to pricing of healthcare will be allowed to continue
Victory for regulator, members of medical schemes
The prescribed minimum benefits (PMBs) which protect members of medical schemes remain in place
Regulator deregisters GetMed Medical Scheme
Complaints received from its members
There are 2 realities about private medical cover in SA
Firstly it is expensive and secondly, benefit structures are complex
The latest on Bonitas Medical Fund
Postponement of the special general meeting and elections to 28 May 2011
Regulator wants curator for Sizwe Medical Fund
Investigation points to material irregularities
Bonitas in new hands
Costs awarded on a punitive basis
Regulator wants curator for Bonitas Medical Fund
... the third-largest medical scheme
Resolution no longer an administrator and managed care organisation
Flagrant contravention of the provisions contained in Regulation 23 of the Medical Schemes Act
How to choose your medical aid
I’m often asked by patients to
SAG Response to SAMA
Reduce the power of administrators
Specialist Advocacy Group overview
Particularly concerned for the safety of the patient in the current environment
Nonsense, says Discovery Health, we’ve never been better - response to newsletter
DHMS continues to enjoy the highest rating of any medical scheme in South Africa
Public or private practice?
Healthcare is a monopolistic business


Available Recruitment:
No Vacancies Listed...


ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.