Google
RSS Feeds RSS | Views on ITInews | contact | terms of use | privacy 
 


Editorial Categories:

FINANCIAL SERVICES
ADVISERS & BROKERS
BANKING & BONDS
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
COLUMNISTS
CONSUMER AFFAIRS
CRIME & FRAUD
ECONOMY & GLOBAL
EDUCATION & TRAINING
ESTATES & WILLS
HEALTHCARE INSURANCE
INDUSTRY & LEGISLATION
INSURANCE
INVESTING
LEGAL AFFAIRS
LIABILITY INSURANCE
LIFE INSURANCE
MARKETING
PEOPLE & COMPANIES
POLITICS
PROPERTY
RETIREMENT PROVISION
REVIEWS
ROAD ACCIDENT FUND
SHARES & UNIT TRUSTS
SHORT-TERM INSURANCE
TAXATION
TECHNOLOGY
VIEWS & LETTERS


Forthcoming Events:

No Upcoming Events



Save by getting insurance quotes


Proudly South AfricanInforming Consumers and Financial Advisors since 1988 | Click Here to Advertise
Car, household, life and business insurance quotes

News Article : Regulating the Foreign Exchange Market
Category: Industry & Legislation : Competition Commission
Author:Jac Laubscher
Email:[email protected]
Posted:06 Jun 2015

 Email this article Comment on this Article  Print this article

Why is the South African probe not being conducted by the Reserve Bank

The announcement by the Competition Commission (CC) of South Africa on 19 May that it was launching an investigation into a number of mostly international banks for alleged “price fixing” in the foreign exchange market related to trades involving the South African rand has caused quite a stir.

The announcement has come hot on the heels of a number of international banks in the UK and the USA being fined heavily for manipulating fixes in the foreign exchange markets to their own benefit.

To date a total of more than $10 billion has been paid in fines by the banks in question, with the three most heavily fined banking groups, viz. Barclays ($2,32 bn), Citigroup ($2,29 bn) and JP Morgan ($1,9 bn), also featuring in the South African probe.

In fact, the CC’s announcement states that its investigation “follows similar investigations by other competition authorities in other jurisdictions”.

Apart from the investigations in other countries being conducted by financial market regulators and not the competition authorities, it appears that the CC’s action has been prompted by international events.

How the CC intends to conduct its probe in view of the fact that according to BIS statistics approximately 50% of the trade in the rand takes place in offshore money centres is not clear.

Some commentators have questioned why the South African probe is not being conducted by the Reserve Bank in view of its responsibility for monitoring the foreign exchange activities of authorised dealers and other market participants.

However, there is a more fundamental issue at stake that once again points to a lack of coordination in the conduct of economic policy.

The South African authorities are in the process of implementing a reformed structure of financial regulation, referred to as the “twin peaks model”.

As part of this initiative two new regulators will be created, viz. a Prudential Authority (PA) that will be housed in the Reserve Bank and a Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA).

In a presentation forming part of a series of public workshops earlier this year the National Treasury described the focus area of the latter as follows: “Market conduct regulation aims to prevent, and manage when prevention is not successful, the dangers that arise from a financial institution conducting its business in ways that are unfair to customers or undermine the integrity of financial markets and confidence in the financial system.”

At the centre of monitoring market conduct will be legislation requiring financial institutions to treat their customers fairly.

Chapter 8 of the Draft Market Conduct Policy Framework for South Africa furthermore deals specifically with “enhancing the efficiency and integrity of the financial markets”.

The reform of South Africa’s financial regulation structure is furthermore aligned with principles agreed on by the G20 that will make it easier to work with our counterparts in other jurisdictions.

Initially this legislation was primarily aimed at how financial institutions treat their retail customers.

However, the presentation mentioned above states that the monitoring of financial sector conduct will also extend to the wholesale segment (recognising it will require a different approach), and in particular that “forex rigging” is included under market conduct failures.

This raises the question as to why the CC has decided to embark on its investigation. Judging by the media release announcing the probe, the Commission seems to be totally oblivious to the ongoing process of implementing the “twin peaks” regulatory reforms.

If it is a matter of the CC standing in for the FSCA until it is operational, it would have been helpful if this had been spelled out.

There is another way in which the involvement of the CC in financial market regulation is problematic.

Although competition policy and financial regulation share an interest in market structure and conduct at a micro-economic level, and both ultimately influence macro-economic outcomes, it would be unusual for anti-competitve behaviour in product and services markets to pose a systemic risk in the way that financial crises have illustrated financial misconduct to do.

In other words, whereas competition policy can (and usually does) stop at the micro (even ad hoc) level, financial regulation always has to reckon with its macro and systemic implications.

If exchange rates are misaligned because of manipulation by forex traders it is not merely a matter of the other party being financially disadvantaged, something that could be corrected by the payment of damages.

Misaligned exchange rates will influence the balance of payments and are likely to cause or worsen imbalances.

They could also affect measured inflation, depending on their impact on the direction and magnitude of changes in exchange rates.

Interest rates could therefore by extension be distorted, with possible negative effects on real economic activity.

Financial sector conduct/misconduct furthermore entails much more than manipulating exchange rates and includes aspects that fall decidedly outside the scope and mandate of the competition authorities and it will be best if all facets of financial sector conduct are dealt with comprehensively to ensure consistency.

In this regard it is worthwhile to take note of the UK’s Fair and Effective Markets Review that will be released on 10 June.

One of its aims is to promote a uniform approach to the regulation of all financial markets and the Review is widely expected to recommend subjecting the so-called FICC markets (fixed income, currencies and commodities) to scrutiny similar to that for the equity market (inter alia banning practices such as insider trading and front-running from all markets) and to strengthen the powers of financial regulators to impose fines on wayward financial institutions.

In conclusion, it would therefore be advisable for the South African authorities to clarify the relationship between the CC’s forex trading probe and the work of the soon-to-be-established FSCA to avoid further policy confusion.

Jac Laubscher, Economic Advisor: Sanlam Limited

Comments:
There are no comments at this stage. Be the first to comment!
Please Login To Comment On an Article - Click here To Login

ITInews invites comments at the foot of each of its articles in which readers can respond freely - anonymously if they wish - to various topical issues and industry debates. However, comments submitted by readers that are defamatory or deemed, by the editors, to be racist or obscene will be deleted from the database. Furthermore, ITInews's editor would like to caution potential posters on its websites that while it welcomes robust debate, it will not hesitate to make the IP addresses of the authors of such defamatory statements available to the authorities, in the event of a court order compelling them to do so.



Get car, home, life and business insurance quotes in 3 easy steps



Join us today

Insurance Quotes


Car Insurance Quotes
Household Insurance Quotes
Business Insurance Quotes
Funeral Insurance Quotes
Life Insurance Quotes

Read the InsuranceQuotes Blog

Industry & Legislation
Competition Commission
FAIS
FICA
Financial Sector Charter
FSB
LOA
NCA
POPI
Regulatory Compliance
SAIA
Statutory Changes

More in Industry & Legislation
Stealing a nation's future
FICA
South Africa loses billions to illicit financial flows (IFFs)
Does financial regulation thwart moral hazard - Avoiding another global financial crisis
Regulatory Compliance
World-leading finance expert to speak at UCT
Competition authorities should be cautious of entering the terrain of price regulation, says expert
Competition Commission
There is no suggestion in the Act
Is your business ready to deal with the ramifications of POPI law?
POPI
Small and medium-sized business most at risk
The Competition Regime is a system usually known as criminal extortion
Regulatory Compliance
They simply pay up on demand
The new Expropriation Bill - better but still bad
Statutory Changes
Between 50% and 90% of land reform projects have failed
Competition Amendment Act partly commences
Competition Commission
Market inquiry provisions take effect on 1 April 2013
Financial inclusion moves to centre stage as world grapples with recovery
Regulatory Compliance
Stringent regulation has potential to strangle growth - Deloitte expert
South Africa begins ACORD standards pilot
Regulatory Compliance
Sharing data and also meeting new regulatory requirements
South African insurance heads speak out on increasing legislation
Regulatory Compliance
Consumers the legislation aimed to protect might well end up footing the largest part of the bill
Government moves to block Gaddafi and listed Libyans's funds
FICA
Statement by Minister Pravin Gordhan regarding the UNSC Resolution on Libya
Financial Services Board Vs. Dynamic Wealth Group
FSB
Court dismisses FSB application to place part of Dynamic Wealth under curatorship
Withdrawal of licenses of Dynamic Wealth companies
FAIS
Guilty of contravention of the law, defiance or circumvention of regulation
FSB appoints trustees for electrical contracting industry retirement funds
FSB
Boards were not properly constituted as the rules of the funds required
Falling short of FAIS 'fit and proper' requirements
FAIS
The representative's dishonesty supervened his inability to do his job
New Era Life company placed under curatorship
FSB
Serious contraventions of various provisions of the Long-Term Insurance Act
Plastic plethora
NCA
Challenge to make National Credit Act work
LOA Chairman’s address - Media representative lunch: 30 May 2007
LOA
Continue to test us against these standards – we will definitely not always get it right
Family assistance business an afterthought of FAIS
FAIS
Letter to the Editor - funeral policy business
Things to do
LOA
Change or be changed . . . the 2007 LOA Conference

Join ITInews in supporting Helpnet.org.za

Available Recruitment:
No Vacancies Listed...


ITM Website Design Cape Town
Copyright © 2005 - 2015 ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. All rights reserved Insurance Times & Investments Online and ITInews. ..::ISSN 1995-1256::.. No part of the materials including graphics or logos, available in this Web site may be copied, photocopied, reproduced, translated or reduced to any electronic medium or machine-readable form, in whole or in part, without specific permission from ITInews Online Publications (Pty) Ltd. Distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited.